WHY
THE UCC FILING www.worldnewsstand.net/law/ucc.htm
Registration,
Legal Title and Ownership
When
you, as the owner of a thing, registered it with the United States or
one of its subdivisions, you let the United States hold the legal title
to your thing based on misrepresentation and failure to disclose material
facts to you at the time of registration. You probably retained possession
of the thing. The United States invested the title and made a profit.
If
you did not specifically authorize the United States and its agents
to invest the legal title, the profits made from that title belong to
you, because as the owner, you remain the equitable title holder. Legally
all the profits from the investment of the titles to all your registered
things must go into a fund for your benefit. If they did not put the
profits in a trust fund of some sort, it would be fraud.
Just
acquiring the titles through what is promoted as mandatory registration,
is fraud. If the scenario attributed to Mandell House is now in full
application in the United States, which it is, the officers of the United
States could be charged and convicted with treason IF they had not provided
a remedy, which they did. -- House Joint Resolution 192 on June 5, 1933.
This
is their insurance policy to assure they are not convicted of treason.
That does not mean they cannot becharged with treason, but the courts
will dismiss based on failure to state a claim upon which relief can
be granted. Because you have a remedy outside the court, you cannot
sustain a charge of treason.
The
problem in the past with trying to discharge public debts with instruments
that could not be processed through your bank on the corner, was that
those discharge instruments did not route through the Federal Reserve.
It is the bean counter for the national debt. That debt is first and
primarily owed to the people who are the equitable titleholders of all
the substance in this country.
If
you try to discharge a public debt with your discharge instrument, and
you do not route it through the Federal Reserve, it appears you are
receiving a benefit from the United States without exchanging it for
something of value. This is not technically correct because you have
a right to be reimbursed, whether or not you apply it toward the debt
the United States owes you. You are the substance; it is the fiction.
Cont'd
Quid Pro Quo Exchange
